Lame
Steve Dupont

Share this Broadcast

share

Subscribe to this author

subscribe

Message This Author

contact

Star this author

stars

Subscribe

subscribe

Groups, Browse, or Search
Image

Obama wants to double military spending

Posted by Steve Dupont Posted on: 07/17/08

Obama wants to double military spending

Speaking of spending, how about that economy, eh?

Having pored over the financial news/analysis all week -- much to my psychological detriment -- I'd planned to write a column about Obama's economic team, and what they might have up their sleeve, but ...

It doesn't really matter.

(We should all realize by now that politicans do not hold our fate in their hands, the elite bankers and industrialists do. And I'm not talking about your buddy, who's a lender/broker/whatever downtown -- the real money men, who have been the real money men for thousands of years. The Rothschilds, the Morgans, the Rockefellers, the Oppenheimers and so on.)

They're going to screw us real bad, with a wink and a nod from the Fed, and there's nothing Obama or McCain can or will do about it. Unless they want their heads blown off.

Seriously, folks. These people don't mess around.

But I wanted to talk about another tidbit of news I saw today -- one that absolutely, positively confirms the uselessness of the mainstream media.

Apparently nobody but the Chicago Tribune picked up on this, and even they just blithely reported it without much fanfare.

Ready?

At a speaking engagement in Colorado Springs on July 2, 2008, Barack Obama was quoted as saying:

"We cannot continue to rely only on our military in order to achieve the national security objectives that we've set. We've got to have a civilian national security force that's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded."



Now, at this point your eyes should be popping out of your head like a cartoon character -- HOOOO-GA!

Either that, or you should be pulling an Arnold Drummond -- "What'chu talkin' bout Willis?!"

A "civilian national security force?" You mean, kind of like a Stasi-esqe secret police? Then YES! That sounds like a super idea!

"That's just as powerful, just as strong, just as well-funded [as the military]." You mean, we're going to give these civilian enforcers nearly half a trillion dollars (each year) worth of the most cutting-edge (killing) technology, sort of like we already do with Blackwater USA over in Iraq?

Once again, CHA-CHING! I think you've got a real winner there, Mr. Obama (although I have a sneaking suspicion you have Mr. Brzezinski to thank for this little gem).

Who can argue that nasty terrorists with dirty bombs are hiding everywhere in our communities? You ever look behind the milk at the grocery store? How about that big stuffed teddy bear at your kid's daycare? I didn't think so -- which is exactly why a hell force of civilian mercenaries and spies is absolutely essential.

To our freedom, that is.

After all, programs like this and this and this were a step in the right direction, but we can do much better.

God help us.

0Vote!
Links
  • Kustie the Klown said on 18 Jul 15:42
    This latest BS from history's most accomplished con artist shouldn't be taken too seriously. At least I hope Obama is just BSing. Truth is, we won't know until he is president what he actually intends to do. For anyone to question his intentions on this or any other issue is simply racist. One has to wonder, though, whether might be a connection between Obama's advocacy of a $500 billion per year domestic secret police (which is what his comments, if taken at face value, would entail) and Michelle Obama's February speech at UCLA, in which she said this: "Barack Obama will require you to work. He is going to demand that you shed your cynicism. That you put down your divisions. That you come out of your isolation, that you move out of your comfort zones. That you push yourselves to be better. And that you engage. Barack will never allow you to go back to your lives as usual, uninvolved, uninformed."

  • Kustie the Klown said on 18 Jul 15:44
    The audio of the above mentioned Michelle Obama speech can be found at the following evil, right-wing hate site: http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=NjljYjA3YTYzMjU2ZjA5Yzg1MmM2YjIzZjEyN2ZjZjk=

  • Kustie the Klown said on 18 Jul 15:51
    I wonder if any of the media stars-cum-Obama-press-secretaries who will be accompanying the Messiah on his Europe trip and reporting on his efforts to pretend that he is the real president (hey--wonder if anyone remembered to pack the fake presidential seal!!!???!!!) will have the cojones to ask Obama whether the forced political activities alluded to in Michelle's UCLA speech will be within the mandate of his secret domestic police force.

  • Kustie the Klown said on 18 Jul 15:56
    I always get a chuckle when I hear people go off about how fascist the evil, monstrous George W Bush is. Here we have a REAL LIVE would-be fascist in Obama, making REAL LIVE fascist proposals, and nobody says a word about it. It is really amazing what you kind of wild and out-there policy proposals you can get away with if you hide them under the skin of a black candidate, for whom any criticism is judged to be bigoted. One must wonder, with this New Yorker magazine cover brouhaha, what kind of retribution Obama has in mind for his critics once he gets into office. I mean, he's going to have a $500 billion secret police at his behest, and they are going to need something to do. Perhaps pogroms directed at the New Yorker offices will be in order?? Of course, there is also the smiley-face-fascism impulse behind such "benign" ideas as the re-imposition of the "Fairness Doctrine", which is going to be one of the first proposals of an Obama administration.

  • Steve Dupont said on 18 Jul 18:33
    You can chuckle all you want, but the fact is that W has advanced the ball closer to absolute tyranny than any other president. Clinton made some serious yardage, but Bush surpassed his efforts within months of 9/11. Next the ball will likely be handed to Obama, who will continue running, as half the populous (Democrats) breathe a huge sigh of relief that Bush is history.

  • Kustie the Klown said on 18 Jul 22:45
    More than Lincoln and FDR?? Wow, that dopey, chimp looking idiot from Crawford was so connivingly smart that he managed to trick us all!! Consarnit! I assume that you include in Bush's tally of advancing tyranny within months of 9/11 his and his confederates' perpetration of 9/11 itself. As long as it's your guy who is the tyrant, I guess it's all okay! By the way, don't get the wrong impression that by riffing on your assessment of Bush's alleged "absolute tyranny" that I agree with it in the slightest. Because I don't. It's too bad we may have to deal with an actual fascist-leaning would be tyrant for you to have to learn the difference, but oh well. I only have one vote so there's not much I can do about it.

  • Kustie the Klown said on 18 Jul 22:50
    By the way, the standard technique you have settled into in responding to my comments--ignore the substance of my statement, turn it around and "refute" it by implying that some republican is the REAL culprit who's behind it all, a la Rush being the dastardly beast behind the ACTUAL leftist convention protesters--is already getting kind of boring. You're capable of better.

  • Steve Dupont said on 19 Jul 01:56
    Republican or democrat doesn't mean anything to me anymore. They're both bought and paid for by the same institutions. I know it drives you crazy that we can't debate within the left-right paradigm, but I'm just not going to get sucked into it. We need to all take off the red and blue glasses and see things for what they really are. Our nation has been hijacked by globalist swine. Bush is nobody. He's a puppet, just like his daddy was. And whether it's Obama or McCain, the next president will be a puppet, too.

  • theskinny said on 22 Jul 02:41
    Personally, I didn't see any "substance" to respond to...

Leave a Comment


about us | contact | terms | privacy | advertise | help | press | feedback